AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 35% (2331MHz vs 1725MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +23%

4.416 TFLOPS

Blender

Radeon Pro W6400

221

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +169%

596

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +137%

19

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +100%

40

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +82%

64

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Nov 2019

Radeon Pro

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1530 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1725 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

12

Compute Units

-

SM Count

20

768

Shading Units

1280

48

TMUs

80

32

ROPs

32

-

12

RT Cores

-

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

8 MB

L3 Cache

-

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.20 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

138.0 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

8.832 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.416 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

138.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W

TDP

100W

250 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

TU116

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

TU116-250-KA-A1

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM

2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon PRO V710

3

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition

4

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

5

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS

6

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes