AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

VS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 590 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2331MHz vs 1545MHz)

Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)

AMD Radeon RX 590 's Advantages

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Radeon Pro W6400

3.58 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 590 +98%

7.119 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Radeon Pro W6400

8

Radeon RX 590 +200%

24

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Radeon Pro W6400

20

Radeon RX 590 +130%

46

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Radeon Pro W6400

35

Radeon RX 590 +102%

71

Radeon Pro W6400

VS

Radeon RX 590

Graphics Card

Jan 2022

Release Date

Nov 2018

Radeon Pro

Generation

Polaris

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz

Base Clock

1469 MHz

2331 MHz

Boost Clock

1545 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

256.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

12

Compute Units

36

768

Shading Units

2304

48

TMUs

144

32

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

12

RT Cores

-

128 KB per Array

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

49.44 GPixel/s

111.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

222.5 GTexel/s

7.161 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.119 TFLOPS

3.580 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.119 TFLOPS

223.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

445.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24

GPU Name

Polaris 30

Navi 24 XL-W

GPU Variant

Polaris 30 XT (215-0922006)

RDNA 2.0

Architecture

GCN 4.0

TSMC

Foundry

GlobalFoundries

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

5.4 billion

Transistors

5.7 billion

107 mm²

Die Size

232 mm²

Board Design

50W

TDP

175W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

2.2

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

-

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

2

AMD Radeon R7 260 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

4

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

5

AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

6

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

7

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

8

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

9

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970

10

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD