Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600 +239%
9.247 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2580 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1600
112
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

165.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
289.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
18.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.247 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
577.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy