Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD FirePro M7740

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD FirePro M7740

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M7740 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2034MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 54.14GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M7740 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600M +776%
7.29 TFLOPS
FirePro M7740
0.832 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Aug 2009
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1224 MHz
Base Clock
-
2034 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
846 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.14GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
66
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
640
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
264
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

130.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
227.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
14.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
832.0 GFLOPS
455.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
M97
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GPU Variant
M97XT-GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy