Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (2034MHz vs 1100MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600M +269%
7.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M385X
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1224 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2034 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
14
66
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
264
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

130.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
227.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
14.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
455.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Strato
Navi 23 WKS-XM
GPU Variant
Strato XT
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy