Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3824 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +39500%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Nov 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3840
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy