Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 134.4GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +1942%
22.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
1.078 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
80
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
512
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF100
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
375W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy