Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7600 +90763%
19.99 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1720 MHz
Base Clock
-
2440 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
32 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

156.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
312.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
39.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.99 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
624.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 33
GPU Name
G98
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.3 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
204 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy