Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +6044%
31.95 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
400
192
TMUs
20
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Redwood
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy