Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 233% (2600MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +5233%
31.95 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 240 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

48
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
-
-
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
64 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 32
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy