Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +2578%
61.32 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

96
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
6144
Shading Units
1536
384
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
-
-
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
96 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

295W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GK104
Navi 31
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy