Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.00GB/s vs 32.26GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +1241%
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon Pro Polaris
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

925 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
G84
Lexa PRO GL
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy