Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8950

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950 +195%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Sep 2015
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
34.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
1385 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
1385 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
86.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Amethyst
Polaris 23 XT GLM
GPU Variant
E8950
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy