Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 302W)
ATI Radeon HD 5950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 5950 +25%
2.088 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1440
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.20 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.088 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
302W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Hemlock
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Hemlock PRO
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy