Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +1972%
1.658 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
80
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Cedar
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy