Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +71%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jun 2020
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
TU106
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy