Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 86W)
ATI Radeon HD 5750 's Advantages
80 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +64%
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5750
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Oct 2009
Radeon Pro
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
9
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
720
32
TMUs
36
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
86W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Juniper
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy