Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 +72%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2012
Radeon Pro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Tahiti
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy