Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300 +88%
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon Pro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Navi 24
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 4.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy