Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (65W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro WX 3200
1.658 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +394%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Pro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
41.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
1.658 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1.658 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
103.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Polaris 23
GPU Name
Fiji
Polaris 23 XT GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy