Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1632 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +1116%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Tahiti
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy