Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +122%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Turks
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy