Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 310 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 310 OEM
0.28 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +174%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
7.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Caicos
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Caicos XT (215-0804070)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy