Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A320 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A320
0.528 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +147%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
All-In-One
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
960
20
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
16.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy