Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R5 A320 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A320 +560%
0.528 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GS
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2008
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
-
825 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
320
Shading Units
32
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
16.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
29W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
G84
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GPU Variant
NB9P-GS1-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy