Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R5 A320 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1455MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R5 A320
0.528 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1593%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
All-In-One
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

750 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
320
Shading Units
3072
20
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
16.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Jet
GPU Name
AD107
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy