Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 +13%
0.499 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
320
20
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
R600
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy