Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240 +1459%
0.499 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jan 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
40
20
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
RV620
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy