Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

AMD Radeon R7 250 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +546%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
44.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cape Verde PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy