Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R7 250X vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R7 250X
VS
AMD FirePro S7150
AMD Radeon R7 250X
AMD FirePro S7150
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +209%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1125 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
72.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
38.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
1216 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
76.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tonga
Cape Verde XT
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy