Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8400 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265X OEM +8065%
2.368 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 SE
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
74.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.368 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Curacao
GPU Name
G86S
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy