Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 340 OEM
0.599 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +450%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Feb 2016
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
-
780 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
18.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
599.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
37.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy