Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +15%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Cayman
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy