CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
VS
AMD Radeon R7 370
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 370 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R7 370 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock975MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 370
+182%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 370
VS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Jun 2015
Release Date
Jan 2009
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
925 MHz
Base Clock
-
975 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Trinidad
GPU Name
GT200B
Trinidad PRO (215-0870020)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
110W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
3
ATI Radeon HD 5850 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
4
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs ATI FireMV 2260
5
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
7
AMD Radeon RX 560 vs AMD Radeon R7 370
8
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs ATI FireMV 2250
9
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs ATI Radeon HD 3550
10
AMD Radeon R7 370 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy