Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 A265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (825MHz vs 758MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M +221%
2.038 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
All-In-One
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
719 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1344
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
-
-
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GK104
Opal XT
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy