Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1200MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe +239%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
All-In-One
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Baffin
Opal XT
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy