Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1455MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1312%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
All-In-One
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
AD107
Opal XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy