Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1190MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +284%
2.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2018
Gem System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Vega 12
Opal XT
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy