Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X

AMD Radeon R7 M265 vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
AMD Radeon R7 M365X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (960MHz vs 825MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M265
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M365X
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
May 2015
Gem System
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

725 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
960 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Litho
Opal XT
GPU Variant
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy