Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 2GB and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M350 2GB
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +288%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System(R7 M300)
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
633.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Litho
GPU Name
TU117
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy