Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 2GB and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M350 2GB
0.633 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +488%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
May 2015
Gem System(R7 M300)
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
633.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Litho
GPU Name
Amethyst
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy