Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

AMD Radeon R7 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M365X and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1125MHz vs 960MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 M365X
0.633 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +263%
2.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
Gem System
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
960 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
19.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
39.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Litho
GPU Name
TU117
Litho XT (216-0868010)
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy