Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +295%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Tonga
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy