Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +112%
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
56W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV730
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy