CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V5700
VS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI FirePro V5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
+112%
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
FirePro V5700
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
56W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV730
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
2
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 265
3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
4
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
5
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
6
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7800P
7
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
8
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
9
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY
10
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Related News
1
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
2
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
3
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
4
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
5
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
6
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
7
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
8
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
9
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
10
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy