Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +77%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
512
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT200
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy