Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7760

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7760

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7760 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 76W)
ATI FirePro V7760 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V7760 +26%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jan 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
76W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy