Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8750

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750 +26%
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy