CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8750
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V8750
VS
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
ATI FirePro V8750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 151W)
ATI FirePro V8750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro V8750
+26%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
VS
FirePro V8750
Graphics Card
Dec 2013
Release Date
Jul 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
800
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
151W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
RV770
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5630
2
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE
3
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs Intel Arc A780
4
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
5
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 100
6
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro S9170
7
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
8
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
9
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 5450 PCI
10
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX 512
Related News
1
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
2
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
3
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
4
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
5
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
6
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
7
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
8
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
9
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
10
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy