Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 100

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1683MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
P102 100 +1031%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1582 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
25
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
3200
32
TMUs
200
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GP102
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy