Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +23%
0.952 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy