Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2620%
0.952 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2013
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
73.60GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
29.76 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
952.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
59.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

65W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
GT216
Cape Verde PRX
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy